-
MEMORANDU M
DATE: J uly 9, 2001
TO: Brian D. Devli n, Director Office of Regulatory Reform
Execut ive Office, Legal Division
FR OM: Conn ie Mun schy, Chief
MIOS HA Stan dar ds Division
Dep artm ent of Consum er & Industr y Services
SUB JECT: Req ues t for Corr ection of R 408 .40625 in th e Michigan Administrat ive Code.
Pur suant to Administrat ive Pr oced ur es Act, Section 56(1), MCL 28.256 , th e Bur eau of Safety an d Regulat ion reques ts that th e Office of Regulatory Reform corr ect an obvious error in th e Michigan Administrat ive Code. The error is conta ined in R 408 .40625 Cert ificat ion an d use of foot protection, a ru le appe ar ing in Constru ction Safety Stan dar d Part 6. Persona l Protective Equipment. The corr ected ru le should read as follows:
R 408 .40625 Cert ificat ion an d use of foot protection.
Rule 625 . (1) Safety toe footwe ar sha ll bear a perman ent mark to show th e manu factur er’s nam e or tra demark an d to show cert ificat ion of com pliance with ANSI stan dar d Z.41-1991 protective foot wear persona l protection, which is adopted in th ese ru les by reference an d ma y be inspected at th e Lan sing office of th e dep artm ent of con sum er an d industr y services. The stan dar d ma y be purcha sed at a cos t of $20 .00 as of th e time of adoption of th ese ru les from th e American Nat iona l Stan dar ds Institut e, 1430 Broadway, New York , New York 10018 , or from th e Michigan Dep artm ent of Consum er an d Industr y Services, 7150 Harr is Drive, Box 30643 , Lan sing, Michigan 48909 .
(2) An employee sha ll wear foot protection or toe protection, or both, if con ditions of th e job ar e likely to cau se a foot injur y. The employee sha ll provide th e foot protection or toe protection un less specifically oth erwise provided for in a collective bar gaining agreement or oth er employer-employee agreement .
(3) Where toe protection oth er than safety toe footwe ar prescribe d in subru le (1) of th is ru le is worn, th e toe protection sha ll ha ve an impact value of not less than that required for th e safety toe footwe ar .
(4) Where a ha zar d is creat ed from a pr ocess , a chemical or mechan ical irr itant which cou ld cau se an injur y or impairm ent to th e feet by absorption or from physical conta ct oth er than from impact, foot wear such as boot s, overshoes, ru bbers, woode n- soled shoes, or th eir equivalent sha ll be worn by th e employee an d provided for by th e employer.
(5) The foot protection sha ll be ma inta ined with out holes due to wear , r ips, or tear s which reduce th e int ended protection.
R 408 .40625 was promu lgat ed as part of # 1998 -098CI , a ru le set that becam e effect ive on J uly 23, 1999 . R 408 .40625 perta ins to th e “cert ificat ion an d use of foot protection.” It was th e int ent ion of th e Bur eau of Safety an d Regulat ion to am end subse ct ion (1), th e “cert ificat ion” port ion of th e R 408 .40625 . It was also th e int ent ion of th e Bur eau to eliminat e subse ct ion (2) an d renum ber th e rema ining subse ct ions, th e “use” port ions of R 408 .40625 .
In prepar ing #1998 -098CI , th e Bur eau ina dvert ent ly submitt ed text to th e Office of th e Great Seal that conta ined th e int ended am endment s to subsections (1) an d (2), but ma de no reference to th e renum bering of th e rema ining subse ct ions.1 As a result, th e am ended R
1 The text submitted to the Office of the Great Seal read:
R 408 .40625 Cert ificat ion an d use of foot protection.
Rule 625 . (1) Safety toe footwear sha ll bear a perman ent mark to show th e manu factur er’s nam e or tra demark an d to show cert ificat ion of complian ce with
t heANS I stan dar dZ41 .1 -1976 , men ’s sa f e ty to ef oot w ea r ,Z.41 -1991 P ROTECTIVE FOOT WEAR P ERS ONAL P ROTECTIO N, which is ADOP TED INTHESE RU LES
i nco r po r ated he r e i nby reference an d ma y be inspe cted at th e Lan sing office of th e dep artm ent of con sum er an d industr y services. THET h isstan dar d ma y be pur cha sed at a cost of$5 .00$20 .00 AS OF THE TIME OF ADOP TION OF THESE RU LES from th e American Nat iona l Stan dar ds Institut e, 1430 Broadway, New York , New York 10018 , or from th e Michigan Dep artm ent of Consum er an d Industr y Services, 7150 Harr is Drive, Box 30643 , Lan sing, Michigan 48909 .(2) When a w oman is una bl e to w ea r f oot p r otection p r esc rib ed i n sub r u l e (1) o f t h is r u l e , she sha llw ea r p r otection w it h a to e gua r d designed by t he manu factu r e r to p r ovide i mpac t p r otection on t hejobThe text submitted to the Office of the Great Seal should have read as follows:
R 408 .40625 Cert ificat ion an d use of foot protection.
Rule 625 . (1) Safety toe footwear sha ll bear a perman ent mark to show th e manu factur er’s nam e or tra demark an d to show cert ificat ion of complian ce with
t heANS I stan dar dZ41 .1 -1976 , men ’s sa f e ty to ef oot w ea r ,Z.41 -1991 P ROTECTIVE FOOT WEAR P ERS ONAL P ROTECTIO N, which is ADOP TED INTHESE RU LES
i nco r po r ated he r e i nby reference an d ma y be inspe cted at th e Lan sing office of th e dep artm ent of con sum er an d industr y services. THET h isstan dar d ma y be pur cha sed at a cost of$5 .00$20 .00 AS OF THE TIME OF ADOP TION OF THESE RU LES from th e American Nat iona l Stan dar ds Institut e, 1430 Broadway, New York , New York 10018 , or from th e Michigan Dep artm ent of Consum er an d Industr y Services, 7150 Harr is Drive, Box 30643 , Lan sing, Michigan 48909 .(2) When a w oman is una bl e to w ea r f oot p r otection p r esc rib ed i n sub r u l e (1) o f t h is r u l e , she sha llw ea r p r otection w it h a to e gua r d designed by t he manu factu r e r to p r ovide i mpac t p r otection on t hejob408 .40625 , as it prese nt ly appe ar s in th e Michigan Administrat ive Code, gives th e appe aran ce that th e ru le addresses th e cert ificat ion of foot protection, but not it s use. We believe that th is err or is obvious in that it would be pur poseless for th e agency to cert ify a stan dar d for protective foot protection but not specify con ditions un der which such foot protection should be used. The obviousness of th is err or is un derscor ed when it is com par ed with th e deta iled stat ement s of cert ificat ion an d use that ar e provided for oth er types of protective gear des cribed thr oughout th e surr oun ding ru les.
The requested corr ection would mak e clear that th e use provisions of R 408 .40625 were not rescinded by th e 1999 am endment .
CM:ch
(2)
(3)An employee sha ll wear foot protection or toe protection, or both , if conditions of th e job ar e likely to cau se a foot injur y. The employee sha ll provide th e foot protection or toe protection un less spe cifically oth erwise provided for in a colle ctive bar gaining agreement or oth er employer-employee agreement .(3)
(4)Where toe protection oth er than safety toe footwear prescribed in subru le (1) of th is ru le is worn , th e toe protection sha ll ha ve an impact value of not less than that required for th e safety toe footwear .(4)
(5)Where a ha zar d is creat ed from a process , a chemical or mechan ical irr itant which could cau se an injur y or impairm ent to th e feet by absorption or from physical conta ct oth er than from impact, footwear such as boots, overshoes, ru bbers, wooden-soled shoes, or th eir equivalent sha ll be worn by th e employee an d provided for by th e employer.(5)
(6)The foot protection sha ll be ma inta ined with out holes due to wear , r ips, or tear s which reduce th e int ended protection.