![]() |
Michigan Administrative Code (Last Updated: November 16, 2016) |
![]() |
Department LR. Licensing and Regulatory Affairs |
![]() |
MIOSHA |
![]() |
Chapter Part 306. Formaldehyde |
![]() |
Part 306. FORMALDEHYDE |
Section 325.51471. Multiple physician review.
All data is extracted from pdf, click here to view the pdf.
-
(1) If an employer selects the initial physician to conduct a medical examination or consultation to determine if medical removal or restriction is appropriate, an employee may designate a second physician to do both of the following:
(a) Review the findings, determinations, or recommendations of the initial physician.
(b) Conduct examinations, consultations, and laboratory tests as the second physician deems necessary and appropriate to evaluate the effects of formaldehyde exposure and to facilitate his or her review of the findings, determinations, or recommendations of the initial physician.
(2) An employer shall promptly notify an employee of the right to seek a second medical opinion after each occasion that a physician who is selected by the employer conducts a medical examination or consultation for the purpose of medical removal or restriction.
(3) An employer may condition its participation in, and payment for, the multiple physician review mechanism upon the employee doing both of the following within 15 days after receipt of the employer's notification, as required in subrule (2) of this rule, or receipt of the initial physician's written opinion, whichever is later:
(a) Informing the employer that the employee intends to seek a second medical opinion.
(b) Initiating steps to make an appointment with a second physician.
(4) If the findings, determinations, or recommendations of a second physician differ from those of an initial physician, the employee and the employer shall ensure that efforts are made for the 2 physicians to resolve their disagreement. If the 2 physicians are unable to quickly resolve the disagreement, the employer and the
employee, through their respective physicians, shall designate a third physician who shall be a specialist in the field at issue to do both of the following:
(a) Review the findings, determination, or recommendations of the prior physicians.
(b) Conduct examinations, consultations, laboratory tests, and discussions with the prior physicians as the third physician deems necessary to resolve the disagreement between the prior physicians.
As an alternative, the employer and the employee or authorized employee representative may jointly designate a third physician.
(5) An employer shall act consistent with the findings, determinations, and recommendations of the third physician, unless the employer and the employee reach an agreement that is otherwise consistent with the recommendations of at least 1 of the 3 physicians.
History: 1990 AACS; 1993 AACS.